I’ve been thinking about the recent New York Times article, The Troubling Trend in Teenage Sex, by
that lays out just how dangerous—and how mainstream—sexual asphyxiation (colloquially called “choking”) is among teenagers. The entire must-read piece is very disturbing, of course, but one line in particular, pissed me off.Orenstein writes, “I’d like to point high school health teachers to evidence-based porn literacy curricula, but I realize that incorporating such lessons into their classrooms could cost them their jobs.” In other words, the moral taboo around sex in the United States means that many schools can’t address the pervasive influence of online pornography, including choking—a sex act that is portrayed as titillating and normative but as Orenstein reveals, “can damage our brains, impair intellectual functioning, undermine mental health, even kill us.” The average age of first exposure to pornography is twelve years old and by age seventeen, three-quarters of teenagers have viewed online porn.
The United States is painfully out of touch when it comes to sexual health and education.
In fact, there’s no federal mandate for sex ed in the United States, and as of 2023 only twenty-five states and D.C. require both sex and HIV education. In states where sex ed is compulsory, programs typically stress abstinence, focusing on the perils of sex, and most don’t require sex education to be medically accurate. That’s right, your children might be deliberately fed misinformation about, say, the effectiveness of condoms and other contraception to skew their behavior in favor of the morality standards of the adults who run the state. The magical thinking goes: if we tell kids sex is bad, they won’t have it. In fact, teenagers who’ve received abstinence-only information still have sex before marriage, they’re just less likely to use contraception or to be tested for STIs. Inconceivably, many states that don’t teach kids about sex and pregnancy also restrict or ban abortion.
Sex ed as violence and rape prevention
Comprehensive sex education (CSE) is crucial not just for preventing pregnancy and STDs, but it’s also credited with reducing sexual violence and rape, in part because it helps debunk common myths found in porn. It also unpacks the complex and confusing emotions that often accompany sex, teaching how desire, pleasure, and safety factor into healthy relationships. Jaclyn Friedman, an educator, activist, and the author of several books about sex, power, and consent makes that point in her essay about preventing sexual violence:
…when I’m asked to share a story about why I’m so passionate about sex ed advocacy, I don’t tell a story about the sex ed I deserved but didn’t get. I tell a story about the sex ed someone else didn’t get, and that I deserved for them to have.
When I was 20 years old, I was sexually assaulted by someone I knew. He wasn’t someone I was dating or even liked, but we were at a party together, and he followed me back to my room uninvited.
In the aftermath, it became clear that this was not a guy who was used to thinking about how his actions affect other people, a guy who had never once considered the concept of consent, and one who definitely didn’t think he would face any consequences if he just took what he wanted. In other words, the guy who hurt me had been failed by his sex and relationships education, and I have been forever harmed by the education he didn’t get.
Friedman is right and there is plenty of scientific evidence supporting the efficacy of sex education. She goes on to say,
A 30 year meta-analysis of studies on the effectiveness of sex education found, among many other benefits, that quality sex ed reduces the odds that students will be the perpetrators or the victims of violence. It also increases the likelihood that students who see others being targeted will do something to interrupt the abuse.
Research out of Columbia found, too, that when girls received CSE prior to college, including learning specific skills for refusing sex, they were 50% less likely to be sexually assaulted in college. And a Dutch longitudinal study showed the more a child had learned from their school’s porn literacy education, the less likely they were to see women as sex objects.
But science, schmience, I guess.
From online porn to college dorm
Abominable sex education makes it even more likely kids are turning to free porn for information; porn that follows a relatively homogeneous script that looks something like this: Sexual encounters begin without negotiation, sometimes suddenly. The man is in charge, is often rough, and the woman plays along, usually gratefully, even if it began by force, because women enjoy domination and degradation. Sex ends once he has an orgasm. So the porn that girls—or certainly their male partners—are seeing tells a powerfully different story from the one most parents want for their daughters. And, I hope, for their sons.
Boys who’ve viewed a lot of porn fantasize about and incorporate the behaviors they see into their sexual scripts with girls. The more porn boys and men see, the more likely they are to use dominant or sexually aggressive behaviors in sex, such as spanking, calling their partners “slut,” “whore,” or “bitch,” pressuring them into doing things they don’t want to do, such as penile gagging and ejaculating on their faces, often believing this means doing sex well. Twenty-two percent admitted to slipping their penis in a partner’s anus without first asking. As for choking, nearly two-thirds of women in a survey of 5,000 students said a partner had choked them during sex, most of whom were not asked first. The issue isn’t kink; it’s that, increasingly, even when boys have girls’ consent to mess around or to have sex, they see rough sex as a natural extension of it and don’t ask their partners for further consent.
What can parents do to fill the gap
Aside from lobbying your kids’ school district to include porn literacy curricula if it doesn’t already, we know open communication about sex between parents and children makes a difference in kids’ sexual choices and can teach them to respond more critically to explicit material. Given some kids are stumbling on porn even younger than age twelve, we should introduce the concept to them at around age eight. As with all sexual health, sex educators suggest multiple brief conversations over time, not just a single talk.
Our overarching job is to help place porn and the erotic on opposite ends of a spectrum for our kids and to equip young people with the skills to decide what they want. Porn teaches them real intimacy is unerotic. We want kids to know that what is sexy is consent, respect, and intimacy, not the sexist hostility depicted in porn. Ideally, we want to teach them about sex and about porn before porn defines their under- standing of sex or traumatizes them.
We want younger kids to know the basics: porn is people performing sexual acts for a camera; it’s made for adults and isn’t appropriate for children. Once they’re a little bit older, be clear without being judgmental about wanting them to avoid porn and explain why. You might say something like “I’ll be brief, but I want you to hear why it’s not appropriate for you to watch porn: It’s unrealistic and I don’t want you to ever think that’s what sex is like. It’s often violent, particularly against women, and shows them and people of color in stereotypical and demeaning ways. Lots of studies show it can warp a young person’s understanding of sex, and I want you to be able to write your own story of intimacy with other people, not have your desires and what makes you feel connected to another person prodded by online algorithms.” They urgently need to hear too that choking is never okay, not even in most BDSM communities. If part of their interest in porn is learning about sex, let them know you’re open to any questions and can send them some alternatives for learning about it. Amaze.org and Scarleteen.com are excellent resources for all things sex ed.
You can also let teens know there are more ethical and realistic kinds of porn, which are usually behind a paywall, so they don’t feel shamed if they saw and liked porn. But all kids should hear that most easily accessible porn is made for and by men and doesn’t take women’s actual desires into consideration. For older girls specifically, you might add something like “You probably know better than me that porn is shaping the landscape of sex, so I want you to be aware some boys are going to have unrealistic or even dangerous expectations of sex. You get to have your own expectations for what sex looks like.” The caveat is that girls can also enjoy porn (and kink), so if we frame it as something only boys benefit from, we risk shaming them for feelings and experiences that diverge from that narrative.
Ultimately, our message is good sex happens in the space where their desires and their partners’ overlap. And no one gets, ya know, brain damage.
[NOTE: You can find much more about teaching kids about boundaries and consent in my book available for preorder now]
In honor of #SAAM—Sexual Assault Awareness month (April)—and #SexEdForAll month (May), I wrote a piece for Stop Sexual Assault In Schools—an organization brimming with resources. You can read my tips for addressing sexual assault with kids before it happens and if it happens here:
I think it's also very important to teach our kids that what they see in porn is the end point of runaway competition to get men/boys (and increasingly women/girls) dopamine addicted, overcoming constant habitation by present ever more extreme scenarios and imagery. That porn is an addictive nightmare, dangerous to be caught in, and even more dangerous to people whose sexual partner's sexuality is formed in that nightmare.
All the advice here serves young people well. But we still live in a world of weird prudish ideas about sex. Parents often never “teach” their children anything deeper than” just say no.” The reality is parents are poorly educated about sex and are just keeping up with the tradition.
When you think about how many sex-info Q&A columns you can find in podcasts, magazines, alternative newspapers and social media, you realize that even adults are stumbling around in the dark. Adults without a well rounded understanding of sex from anatomy, content, equality, techniques, sex toys, birth control are seeking these answers for themselves. That doesn’t make them prepared to teach anyone no less embarrassed children.
Sex education needs to start early just by calling body parts by their real names and not your “winky”. Often early exploration is a simple curiosity. My oldest grandson at 9 yr. searched for boobs on my computer and came to PornHub. A surprise when I woke my computer next day. I told we had to tell his parents so they could explain what he found. My son spent some time with him and discovered he didn’t want to see all those naked people he just want to know what women’s breasts looked like. Sounded reasonable, so my son found an appropriate book that showed all the private parts in tasteful color portraits. That event was the opening for open honest conversations about sex. Their talks got more detailed until he turned 26.
But educators are faced with having to fill some pretty big gaps. Porn today is a extremely poor teacher. It reinforces the incorrect idea that boys deserve it and girls really want it even if they say no. Dominance during sex id misunderstood completely if you learn it from porn. “Kinky” can play a healthy part of sex with consenting adults but there is a lot more misinformation than good advice. In a school setting, you’ll never be discussing whips and gags! Saying sex is pleasurable can be problematic.
My second concern is pleasure - a critical part of a lasting sexual relationship. My husband and I were married 48 years before he passed away. We had an exciting sexual relationship that lasted for 45 years before he became sick. The conservative Christian evangelists want to discourage any sex that isn’t for procreation. I feel sorry for those stick up their butt conservatives. God wouldn’t have made sex so pleasurable, intimately beautiful or a bond of deep love if she didn’t want us to partake.
Project 2025, an ultra conservative Christian Nationalist manifesto that Trump has pledged to follow. Eliminates all sex education, gender info, transgender info along with outlawing all contraceptives. Only the old fashioned rhythm method will be allowed. SCARY STUFF.
Should Trump regain the White House, you won’t be discussing advanced sex ed. You won’t be teaching it at all. Because as you well know, teaching it makes kids do it.